Re: PL vs NL
[quote:8aa7deede4="Zero"]Since this is a poker site, I figured I'd ask a poker question.
Pot Limit verse No Limit.
Does playing Pot Limit the damage variance may have on your bankroll by protecting how much you can lose on any given hand, while at the same time still relies on strategy/skill that playing No Limit offers?
Part 2 to the question, does the game being played factor into the equation at all?[/quote:8aa7deede4]
I will speculate on this one, but I am not the pro here, this would be Tom or Jim's arena.
1. I used to call Pot Limit "Super Limit" because it allowed the situation to escilate more gradually. You could have an extra step or two of agression to make a decision. But I found that all three have their own quirks. You have to be a little more cautious in no limit than pot limit, but you still have the advantage of making big moves. As for bankroll protection, I definately can't say for sure, but I assume not, as all pot limit games I have ever railed or played in are out of control quickly.
2. Definately. Omaha versus Hold Em pot limit are two wildly different games. |
