Poker Articles

Online Poker Reviews
Online Poker
Poker Strategy
Editorials
Web Articles
Legal Issues

Archive

Play Online Poker
FullTilt Code: westonft
Poker Blogs

Vanman's Poker Blog

Local Area Poker

Dallas Area Poker

Local Home Games

Local Poker Rooms

Houston Poker Rooms
Oklahoma Poker Rooms
New York Poker Rooms
Dallas Poker Rooms
Fort Worth Poker Rooms
Boston Poker Rooms
New Mexico Rooms Poker Rooms
Iowa Poker Rooms Poker Rooms
Washington Poker Rooms
Louisiana Poker Rooms
Washington D.C Poker Rooms
san diego Poker Rooms
Philadelphia Poker Rooms
arlington, tx Poker Rooms
atlanta Poker Rooms
katy Poker Rooms
VANCOUVER,WASHINGTON Poker Rooms
MONTANA Poker Rooms
billings,Mt Poker Rooms
abilene Poker Rooms
abilene Poker Rooms
phoenix,az Poker Rooms
phoenix,az Poker Rooms
Austin, TX Poker Rooms

Poker Talk
Re: I am the greatest!
Full Tilt Matrix Poker
Here you go...
$16,000 poker MTT on Full Tilt
Goofy Question

Archives
Strategy Discussion
A drop of advice
Re: OK
Overbetting the pot.
100 SNGs
jinxing myself

Archives
We Support

Full Tilt Bonus

www.BigStack.com

Full Tilt Bonuses

Weston Times Blog

Omaha H/L - Qualifying Low Hands

Omaha H/L - Qualifying Low Hands

Every time I play Omaha High/Low I end up just giving my money away… After discussing my complete failure to grasp the game, Cajun recommended I read Play Poker Like the Pros (by Helmuth) for a good overview of Omaha H/L.

So, I’m reading it. And I understand a lot more than I did previously.

However, I began looking at the “Qualifying Low Hands for Stud 8/b” (on page 316 of the book) and became confused. What a surprise. :)

For those of you that do not have the book, this chart shows the ranking of low hands from best to worst. I’m reading through the list and I think I finally figure out the pattern (what is good, and why) when I run into hand number 34.

It goes like this:

32. 8-6-5-3-A
33. 8-6-5-3-2
34. 8-6-5-4-A
35. 8-6-5-4-2

I understand why hand #32 is better than #33 (A instead of 2). And I understand why #34 is better than #35 (again, A instead of 2). But, why oh why, is hand #33 better than #34? Why isn’t an A/4 a stronger low than a 2/3?

I guess I could just memorize the hands and be done with it, but if someone could help me to understand I sure would appreciate it.

Thanks!
Chuck