Poker Articles

Online Poker Reviews
Online Poker
Poker Strategy
Editorials
Web Articles
Legal Issues

Archive

Play Online Poker
FullTilt Code: westonft
Poker Blogs

Vanman's Poker Blog

Local Area Poker

Dallas Area Poker

Local Home Games

Local Poker Rooms

Houston Poker Rooms
Austin Poker Rooms
Oklahoma Poker Rooms
New York Poker Rooms
Las Vegas Poker Rooms
Dallas Poker Rooms
Fort Worth Poker Rooms
Boston Poker Rooms
New Mexico Rooms Poker Rooms
Iowa Poker Rooms Poker Rooms
Washington Poker Rooms
Phoenix Poker Rooms
Louisiana Poker Rooms
San Antonio Poker Rooms
Illinois-Aurora Poker Rooms
Washington D.C Poker Rooms
san diego Poker Rooms
Pittsburgh PA Poker Rooms
houston Poker Rooms
tampa bay Poker Rooms
houston Poker Rooms
arlington, texas Poker Rooms
Philadelphia Poker Rooms
HOUSTON Poker Rooms
ATLANTA Poker Rooms
arlington, tx Poker Rooms
77032 Poker Rooms
bergen county new jersey Poker Rooms
new jersey Poker Rooms
dallas Poker Rooms
new york city Poker Rooms
NY?C Poker Rooms
new york Poker Rooms
virginia Poker Rooms
dc Poker Rooms
Louisville Poker Rooms
Caesars Poker Rooms
milwaukee,wisconsin Poker Rooms
connecticut Poker Rooms
mansfield, texas Poker Rooms
youngstown ohio Poker Rooms

Poker Talk
tells
Retarded Question
mtgbadboy
Caught a Royal yesterday. . .
Party Poker Observer Chat Disabled

Archives
Strategy Discussion
Re: THE BEST FREEROLL EVERY DAY 19.00!
Hand Question...
FTOPS
Was it the right move?
Full Tilt Poker - FTOPS Event #4

Archives
We Support

Full Tilt Bonus

www.BigStack.com

Full Tilt Bonuses

Weston Times Blog

Betting

Betting

I was reading a situation on the Thunder Keller forums, and I wanted to get your opinion. What intrigues me is that betting patters give away a lot and at the same time they only give away so much.

There are four "moves" in poker in order of base profitability. Folding, checking, betting, or raising. Within those there are "sub-moves" of check-folding and check-raising.

Within betting there are "intentions" such as: Betting for information, Continuation Betting, Betting for Protection, and variances of those.

So it's safe to say that within those inital four moves there are thousands of options that any of these moves could mean, based on the skill of the player, and their intentions withing that individual game. Someone professional like Negranu has shown a propensity for insane play, which could be concieved as "bad" play.

Why am I asking? I would like to see, what you think the capabilities are of someone being able to "stand" truly agressive play. I don't mean the agression of half pot bets, I mean the true agression of Brunson's system. Poker hasn't really changed, the agressors are still agressive, and the weaker players are not. I liked the half and 3/4 pot bets because they negate pot odds for good players, but I am realizing that there are fewer good players out there than I initially thought. I would estimate less than 15% of the players (including me) that visit Choctaw are what I would call about average. That being said that means that they are playing weaker hands than they would prefer and missing more often than not.

So if you generated a table image that really said "If you raise me, we're going to get it all in the middle" would that still be considered a profitable way to play? I considered myself agressive, but after my last visit to Choctaw I realized that there is no way that I can really call myself that if I am afraid to lose the money I bring.

I wanted to ask the gener opinion of the forum. Is a hyper agressive (get your money in when you have the best of it) the best way to play?

This is what happens when I am home with nothing to do.